Definitions
Transfors between 2-categories
Morphisms in 2-categories
Structures in 2-categories
Limits in 2-categories
Structures on 2-categories
Much has been said about inverting a class of morphisms in a category (see localization), and there are many different settings in which one wants to, and can, do this. Homotopical algebra is largely concerned with how to compute the homotopy category so it is locally small. One the other hand, we have simplicial localization which retains all the homotopy information and returns an -category.
If we have a 2-category with a notion of weak equivalence, one could localize the underlying 1-category in a way hopefully compatible with the 2-arrows, or extend the result fully into the 2-dimensional setting. In general this will require bicategories, and is the subject of Pronk 96.
Let be a bicategory with a class of 1-cells. is said to admit a right calculus of fractions if it satisfies the following conditions
[2CF1.] contains all equivalences
[2CF2.]
[2CF3.] For all , with there exists a 2-commutative square
with .
[2CF4.] If is a 2-cell and there is a 1-cell and a 2-cell such that . Moreover: when is an iso-2-cell, we require to be an isomorphism too; when and form another such pair, there exist 1-cells such that and are in , and an iso-2-cell such that the following diagram commutes:
If is a category, then these axioms reduce to the ones of Gabriel and Zisman for a calculus of fractions.
Given such a setup, Pronk constructs the localization of at and the universal functor sending elements of to equivalences.
Let be a category with binary products and pullbacks, together with a class of admissible maps .
The 2-categories and of categories and groupoids internal to admit bicategories of fractions for the class of -equivalences.
The resulting localization is equivalent to the bicategory of anafunctors in . For details, see Roberts (2012).
(Grothendieck toposes as a bicategory of fractions of localic groupoids)
The category of etale-complete localic groupoids (with open source and target maps) admits a bicategory of fractions at open essentially surjective fully faithful functors.
The resulting bicategory is equivalent to the bicategory of Grothendieck toposes, geometric morphisms, and natural isomorphisms.
See Theorem 7.7 in Moerdijk.
Ieke Moerdijk, The classifying topos of a continuous groupoid. I, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Volume 310, Number 2, December 1988.
O. Abbad, E. M. Vitale, Faithful calculus of fractions , Cah. Top. Géom. Diff. Catég. 54 No. 3 (2013) 221-239. (preprint)
E. Vitale, Bipullbacks and categories of fractions, pdf
Dorette A. Pronk, Etendues and stacks as bicategories of fractions, Comp. Math. 102 3 (1996) pp.243-303. (numdam:CM_1996__102_3_243_0)
David Roberts, Internal categories, anafunctors and localisations, TAC 26 (2012) pp.788-829. (pdf)
M. Tommasini, A bicategory of reduced orbifolds from the point of view of differential geometry , arXiv:1304.6959 (2013). (pdf)
M. Tommasini, Some insights on bicategories of fractions I , arXiv:1410.3990 (2014). (pdf)
M. Tommasini, Some insights on bicategories of fractions II , arXiv:1410.5075 (2014). (pdf)
M. Tommasini, Some insights on bicategories of fractions III , arXiv:1410.6395 (2014). (pdf)
See also:
Two bicategories of -linear Grothendieck categories as bicategories of fractions
Last revised on October 15, 2024 at 19:12:56. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.